Why Two Experts Think The Supreme Court Is Prepared To Roll Back Roe V. Wade

Why Two Experts Think The Supreme Court Is Pr...

Suivant

Roundup: Indiana Rejects Redistricting, Trump Bashes Immigrants In Pennsylvania

It’s been a busy week in the political world. We discuss the Indiana state Senate's rejection of President Trump's push to redraw the state’s congressional districts, President Trump's speech on the economy in Pennsylvania in which he denigrated immigrants, and the United States' ...  Afficher plus

Health Insurance Subsidies Expire This Month But Congress Can't Agree On A Fix

The enhanced subsidies 22 million Americans use to help pay for health insurance are set to expire at the end of this month, and when they do, many Americans will see their insurance premiums balloon. We discuss Democrats' and Republicans' competing proposals to address rising he ...  Afficher plus

Épisodes Recommandés

The Supreme Court Considers the Future of Roe
The Daily

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard a case that was a frontal challenge to Roe v. Wade, the nearly 50-year-old decision that established a constitutional right to abortion.

The case in front of the justices was about a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks ...

  Afficher plus

Is this the end of Roe v Wade?
The Story

A draft Supreme Court opinion on the law defining a woman’s right to have an abortion in America was leaked last week, causing uproar - and celebration. So, what’s the history of this law - and what would the end of Roe v Wade mean?

This podcast was brought to y ...

  Afficher plus

On Abortion Laws, It All Goes Back to 2010
The Daily

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the court’s conservative majority argued it was simply handing the question of abortion to the states and their voters to decide for themselves.

But in reality, the court was ensuring that many states, from Arizona to Ohio, ...

  Afficher plus

An Abortion Rights Champion of the 1970s on Life Before and After Roe
The Daily

A little over 50 years ago, Nancy Stearns, a young lawyer, was presenting a case in New York with a bold legal assertion: that the right to abortion was fundamental to equal rights for women.

She never got to conclude her argument — first New York changed the law, then c ...

  Afficher plus