The Second Amendment - What does it mean?

The Second Amendment - What does it mean?

Up next

What's the Strait of Hormuz? And how do blockades work?

You've been hearing about it in the news, but what exactly is the Strait of Hormuz? And as for those blockades...how do they work? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices 

How did federal income taxes get this way?

We haven't always had a federal income tax, and in the beginning, it only applied to the very richest Americans. So how did we end up with the permanent income tax we have today, with all its complicated rules about everything from pre-tax income to deductions and credits? And wh ...  Show more

Recommended Episodes

Postscript: Guns, Violence, and the Law: How Federal Courts are Trying to Figure Out the Second Amendment
New Books in Public Policy

Two blockbuster cases came down in June of 2022. The Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen substantially expanded Second Amendment rights and limited the power of states to regulate concealed carry of firearms. Bruen affected ...  Show more

More Perfect: The Gun Show
Radiolab

Given that we’re all gearing up for the Presidential race, and how gun rights and regulations are almost always centerstage during these times. Today, we’re re-releasing a More Perfect episode that aired just after the October 2017 Las Vegas shooting. It is an episode that att ...

  Show more

We the People: Succession of Power
Throughline

The 25th amendment. A few years before JFK was shot, an idealistic young lawyer set out on a mission to convince people something essential was missing from the Constitution: clear instructions for what should happen if a U.S. president was no longer able to serve. On this episod ...  Show more

Anthony Michael Kreis, "Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development" (U California Press, 2024)
New Books in Intellectual History

One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forc ...  Show more