Episode 333 – Explain why we have jurisdictio...

Follow Dan on LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/cotterdanFollow Pat on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/donald-patrick-eckler-610290824/Predictions Sure To Go Wrong: Padick: Reverse Landry: Affirm Church Mutual: AffirmIL cases: https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/courts/appellate-cour ...  Show more

Follow Dan on LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/cotterdanFollow Pat on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/donald-patrick-eckler-610290824/ Predictions Sure To Go Wrong: Cox: Affirm Salazar: Court will punt Doe: Vacate IL cases: https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/courts/appellate-court/ ...  Show more

Follow the crew: https://twitter.com/chamath https://linktr.ee/calacanis https://twitter.com/DavidSacks https://twitter.com/friedberg Follow the pod: https://twitter.com/theallinpod https://bio.fm/theallinpod 

https://linktr.ee/FromBehindTheBarcast 

This episode contains explicit language quoted from a cheerleader.Recorded on Monday 6/28, Professor Joh walks us through three recent decisions that came in at the end of the term and how they relate to court precedent.California v. TexasMahanoy Area School District v. B.L.Lange ...  Show more